Skip to main content

Military Tribunals – Thomas William HARDIMAN

Name
Thomas William HARDIMAN
Age
29
Married
Yes
Address
Badsey
Occupation
Market gardening

First Hearing

Date of Hearing
4 Jul 1916
Case for exemption
Thomas Hardiman, South View, Badsey, a market gardener in partnership with Joshua John Pethard, said they had 12 acres of ground. He and his partner had talked the matter over and and decided that if either had to go it should be Pethard, as Hardiman understood the business best.
Outcome of appeal
Exemption - temporary
Exemption Conditions (if any)
Till 1 October 1916
Journal Date
8 Jul 1916

Second Hearing

Date of Hearing
17 Oct 1916
Case for exemption
Thomas W Hardiman (29), married, Badsey, a market gardener in partnership with Mr J J Pethard, said his partner was willing to go if the applicant could stop to look after the business.
Outcome of appeal
Exemption - conditional
Exemption Conditions (if any)
Conditional on his partner, Joshua John Pethard, serving
Journal Date
21 Oct 1916

Third Hearing

Date of Hearing
19 Dec 1916
Case for exemption
Mr Geoffrey New appeared for Thomas William Hardiman (29), married, South View, Badsey, market gardener. He had previously been exempted conditional on his partner, J J Pethard, serving. Pethard had been passed by the Medical Board for C3, and consequently has not been called up. The military now applied for a review of Hardiman’s certificate. Mr New argued that Hardiman was exempted conditional on Pethard serving “when called up”; he was quite willing to serve when called up. Mr Cholmondeley maintained that the condition did not hold as Pethard would not under present orders be called up. Hardiman said they had 11 acres of land; Pethard was not capable of managing it.
Outcome of appeal
Military application refused
Journal Date
23 Dec 1916

Other Information

Final Outcome
Presumed to have enlisted after temporary exemption